Music Server vs Computer?

The problem with most servers is that they force you into using FLAC, they don't import .wav files etc.. Lack of flexibility. They are mostly compromised for SQ due to either poor ripping software, poor playback software or both.

There are some exceptions however:

The Antipodes server from New Zealand has none of these limitations and is the only server I have found that sounds identical playing FLAC and wav files.

The Bryston server is also excellent and has few limitations.

I have heard both or had them in my room at trade shows.

I personally use a tweaked Oct 2009 Mac Mini powered with a Hynes supply with Amarra playback software. This is world-class.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

You are better off to use USB output on the server so the master clock is in the DAC or USB converter, not the server.

This also allows upgrading as the technology improves.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

switch-mode power supply? no thank you. The Antipodes has a linear supply with special shielding. It also has USB out that can stream audio. This is a great choice.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio

Here are some other things that make the Antipodes server superior and make it beat most DC transports:

1) The USB output card has a high precision clock with extensive power supply regulation.
2) It uses a minimal Linux build that they control to not interfere randomly with audio
3) It buffers over 1GB of music in RAM before it goes to the output card
4) It uses high quality linear regulated supplies
5) It uses 2.5" disks with custom firmware to control their behaviour
6) It can driveUSB streams out. Async USB provides greater isolation from the noise interference that occurs in digital
transports of any kind.

I have had first-hand experience at shows with this server. One of the best on the market IMO. The ONLY one I have found where .wav and FLAC files sound identical. Even Mac Mini cannot do that.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio