Marty,
I have owned the Original Planet and the CD-25 (purchased based on Treljas recommendation, Thanks Joe!). Both are nice players and the comparison Joe makes above with regard to the two players is quite accurate. I found the Original Planet to be a bit too smooth (lacking detail and somewhat muted) for my taste and liked the CD-25 better. I found that I kept turning up the volume with the Original Planet looking for the music as it were.
To give you more options I also purchased the Cambridge Audio Azur 640C and the Arcam CD-73T and personally liked them both a little better in my system than the CD-25, but each for different reasons. (I do not believe either of these was available when Joe purchased/owned his CD-25. Is that correct Joe?) I liked the CD-73T because it provides very much detail, perhaps too much causing it to be a bit harsh on the high end on all but the best recorded discs not good for those with digititus. The CD-73T was great for hearing and enjoying the magic of detail, not so great for enjoying the music as a whole unless the recording was very very good. The CD-73T was a bit tipped up and dry or analytical sounding without enough overall warmth to the sound for my taste (I was using solid state amplification at the time could be a better match for tubes??). The 640C lacks the detail of the CD-73T but sounds very musical to me well balanced not dry like the CD-73T, but not muted like the Original Planet. To my ear (admittedly untrained compared to Joe) I like the 640C better than the CD-25. I cant articulate it any better than to say that I found myself tapping my toes a bit more with the 640C than with the CD-25.
And yet one more option If you are looking in a higher price range, I would also look at the Consonance CD-120. It is what I ended up with after purchasing the above mentioned players (plus the Planet 2000, the AH! Njoe Tjoeb, et.al.). For me, the CD-120 reveals the detail of the CD-73T in the mids/highs without harshness, provides great low end without over powering the rest of the range, and takes me deeper into the music that any of the above mentioned players.
I agree with Joe that the CD-25 is a great player for the money. So are the 640C, CD-73T, and the CD-120. One thing that I found from all of the CD player swapping, and Joe will agree as I believe he has said it many times, you have to listen and decide for yourself. All the recommendations in the world mean nothing unless YOU like the sound and how the player mates to your system. My owning these players really helped me determine what I was looking for from my CD front end and helped me appreciate some of the subtleties of system matching.
Enjoy!
-- Bob
I have owned the Original Planet and the CD-25 (purchased based on Treljas recommendation, Thanks Joe!). Both are nice players and the comparison Joe makes above with regard to the two players is quite accurate. I found the Original Planet to be a bit too smooth (lacking detail and somewhat muted) for my taste and liked the CD-25 better. I found that I kept turning up the volume with the Original Planet looking for the music as it were.
To give you more options I also purchased the Cambridge Audio Azur 640C and the Arcam CD-73T and personally liked them both a little better in my system than the CD-25, but each for different reasons. (I do not believe either of these was available when Joe purchased/owned his CD-25. Is that correct Joe?) I liked the CD-73T because it provides very much detail, perhaps too much causing it to be a bit harsh on the high end on all but the best recorded discs not good for those with digititus. The CD-73T was great for hearing and enjoying the magic of detail, not so great for enjoying the music as a whole unless the recording was very very good. The CD-73T was a bit tipped up and dry or analytical sounding without enough overall warmth to the sound for my taste (I was using solid state amplification at the time could be a better match for tubes??). The 640C lacks the detail of the CD-73T but sounds very musical to me well balanced not dry like the CD-73T, but not muted like the Original Planet. To my ear (admittedly untrained compared to Joe) I like the 640C better than the CD-25. I cant articulate it any better than to say that I found myself tapping my toes a bit more with the 640C than with the CD-25.
And yet one more option If you are looking in a higher price range, I would also look at the Consonance CD-120. It is what I ended up with after purchasing the above mentioned players (plus the Planet 2000, the AH! Njoe Tjoeb, et.al.). For me, the CD-120 reveals the detail of the CD-73T in the mids/highs without harshness, provides great low end without over powering the rest of the range, and takes me deeper into the music that any of the above mentioned players.
I agree with Joe that the CD-25 is a great player for the money. So are the 640C, CD-73T, and the CD-120. One thing that I found from all of the CD player swapping, and Joe will agree as I believe he has said it many times, you have to listen and decide for yourself. All the recommendations in the world mean nothing unless YOU like the sound and how the player mates to your system. My owning these players really helped me determine what I was looking for from my CD front end and helped me appreciate some of the subtleties of system matching.
Enjoy!
-- Bob