Will the real Steve N. please stand up. In the CD vs FLAC thread you write:
"If you are planning on USB from a computer and you actually have a highly resolving system, FLAC will not sound as good as .wav. Even AIFF files dont sound as good as FLAC. The differences are mostly in the imaging soundstage and compression. FLAC loses a lot of the airiness and high frequency echo cues from the venue.
Steve N.
Empirical Audio"
In this thread you write:
"Depends entirely on the kbps rate of the MP3. If it is 256k or above, it will sond virtually identical to a .wav file except on the most resolving systems on the planet.
Steve N.
Empirical Audio"
So a 256K Mp3 sounds as good as a .wav file but a FLAC file does not? What am I missing?
"If you are planning on USB from a computer and you actually have a highly resolving system, FLAC will not sound as good as .wav. Even AIFF files dont sound as good as FLAC. The differences are mostly in the imaging soundstage and compression. FLAC loses a lot of the airiness and high frequency echo cues from the venue.
Steve N.
Empirical Audio"
In this thread you write:
"Depends entirely on the kbps rate of the MP3. If it is 256k or above, it will sond virtually identical to a .wav file except on the most resolving systems on the planet.
Steve N.
Empirical Audio"
So a 256K Mp3 sounds as good as a .wav file but a FLAC file does not? What am I missing?