I never claimed that youtube was a perfect proxy for sound quality. Nevertheless it does give some indication about sound quality and characteristics.
I'm curious why some people who think youtube is a worthless indicator of sound quality?
Is it because the lower than lossless resolution? I know I can tell better quality recordings from worse quality recordings on 192 kbs MP3.
Or is it because people recording systems aren't professionals and aren't recording them with professional equipment?
Or is there another reason that hearing the recording of reproduction of a recording can't give a good indication of SQ?
I'm curious why some people who think youtube is a worthless indicator of sound quality?
Is it because the lower than lossless resolution? I know I can tell better quality recordings from worse quality recordings on 192 kbs MP3.
Or is it because people recording systems aren't professionals and aren't recording them with professional equipment?
Or is there another reason that hearing the recording of reproduction of a recording can't give a good indication of SQ?