Thanks interesting and deep....
More proof that music is not just an aural sensation.
Now the Nobel Prize committee enters the fray.
Showing 6 responses by mahgister
No need for Nobel laureates to tell me what sitting beside a boom box on wheels at red lights has informed me of for years.I can live with your minimization of this scientific news.... Your joke make sense... At any rate the research is about tactile stimulation from pressure waves at least the part you’re trying to insinuate has anything to do with music.But your ignorance emerge with the second part... Sorry.... «Small minds only perceive trivial facts»-Anonymus Smith |
Listening music you just said had almost nothing to do with the ears alone ? 😁😊 Helen Keller blind deaf and mute listening music... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YyhgVjRXFQ «Anybody knows that music has nothing to do with isolated sound, but everything to do with meaningful sounds»-Groucho Marx directing the orchestra of his brothers... 🤓 «Music comes from the body first before coming to the body» -Anonymus Smith |
« There is no colors , no sounds, no odors, no tactile SEPARATED impressions, no SEPARATED tastes; there is only a RELATION between all these stimulus united in one experience for the brain of a baby, for an artist or for a synaesthete»- Anonymus Smith do you means that i dont hallucinate when i meditate on Bach geometry? or in the sexual impulse of some jazz? This is why Mozart could help the digestive process better than Scriabin? |
In future years our current understanding of the sensory systems in the body - in all living creatures - will seem simplistic, and will further bury by sheer force of accumulating lab data the ridiculous notion of spontaneous generation and accidental advancement of life. The rude treatment of hearing versus seeing that is espoused by audiophile skeptics is caused by another sensory system, the Posterior Numismatic System, which sends impulses indicating the thickness of the wallet one sits upon, influencing the perception of the sound of the system.The sophistication of electronic gear present in our own room is limited by available money...Yes.... Acoustic is at least HALF the part of any high end system...Do you know that? Surely... When you ears touch the sound and look at it , changing an amplifier of 10,000 bucks for a 100,000 bucks one is for most people unwise and useless ... Why ? Because if rightfully embedded, any relatively very good system will do the job at a very high level...Save minute differences... Then constantly saying that audiophiles dont know and cannot know because they cannot afford some gear is a snob gesture not science... Use electrical and mechanical and acoustical control on a relatively good system and you will be relatively NEAR of MOST of the best system that exist, save the extra costlier one in an extra costlier acoustically controlled room... This is fact....No boasting against people here... Instead of boasting about some gear why not learning how to install ANY system? By installing here i dont speak ONLY about "pairing " costly components but using mechanical, electrical and acoustical controls... |