2. music
  3. 127594-79517

Mono vs stereo

Although I like stereo, often I find it contrived.  More fun than actually adding to the music realism.

I see the Beatles have a "mono" collection available.

Are there any "mono"  advocates out there? While I realize there is no "left / right" imaging, is there a sense of realism that isn't captured in stereo? 
jimspov

Showing 2 responses by slaw

slaw's avatar
slaw
22,566 posts
 
brf:

Isn't that how Harry does it?

bdp24:

I always learn from your informative posts. Thanks.
slaw's avatar
slaw
22,566 posts
 
Hi jimspov,

Your post is well received as you are in the "learning mode". This is always good!

I have the Beatles mono box and many others. I've been trying to ad to my mono collection and have a mono cart.

Here's what I've found out through my own investing in mono recordings  over the past 2/3 years.

Since I listen mostly to rock... the early rock recordings that were initially recorded in mono, do sound the best reproduced in mono. Although you can have a good experience through a stereo cartridge, the absolutely best way is in mono with vinyl.

I was surprised early on, how dimensional mono records sound even when through a stereo cart. This just improves with a mono cart. Your question "Is there a greater sense of realism?" is a great one! My answer is yes!

In the end, I think it all depends on how much "the best" reproduction of the music in your own home actually means to you. Then, it IS worth the investment.

Cheers!

More to discover