2. analog
  3. 150194-1294

Mono Reissues and the Conical Stylus

Hi Folks,

Recently I started buying mono reissues from Speakers Corner, Impex, and have recently ordered a few from Analogphonic. They're all of the 'long haired' variety. In the process, I've come to discovery threads where posters claim that the newer mono reissue grooves are cut in a V (stereo) shape rather than the vintage U (mono) shape.
My AT 33 mono cartridge comes with a conical stylus and from what I can tell, so do the better mono cartridges, i.e. the Miyajima Zero Mono. This of course would then create an issue where it pertains to using a conical stylus in a V shaped groove.

Around November, I plan to purchase a Jelco tonearm for my modified Thorens TD 160 and after that, will be looking to upgrade to a higher end mono cartridge. However, I don't see that they're would be a viable solution to the stylus dilemma given that I will only have one tonearm. I do by the way own a collection of early mono records but would like to find a cartridge that better crosses over between my vintage pressings and my reissues. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
128x128goofyfoot
intactaudio
300 posts
 
The warning against playing a stereo record with a mono cartridge stems from the fact that the early mono cartridges didn't have or need any vertical compliance.  The lack of vertical movement effectively chews up any vertical modulation found in the 45º cut stereo groove. Some current day manufacture cartridges like the Miyajima's adhere to this while others have coils in the lateral plane with compliance in both the lateral and vertical plane.  The Denon 102 was designed as a mono cartridge with vertical compliance so radio stations could use the same cartridge to play both mono and stereo cuts.

dave
pryso
1,928 posts
 
Thanks dave.  I suspected that so appreciate the confirmation.
gerrym5's avatar
gerrym5
286 posts
 
Someone help me on these questions. I have a new ELAC PP2 phono preamp. It has a Mono switch. Is it a waste to buy a Hana Mono considering that Mono switch feature? The answer to this question will help me decide on a two arm capable TT or an arm with multiple head shells. 
goofyfoot's avatar
goofyfoot OP
1,370 posts
 
gerrym5,
From my understanding, having a mono switch option is comparative to using a stereo to mono splitter. It is taking a stereo signal, by reading the left and right sides of the groove, via the azimuth tonearm adjustment and then channeling that into mono. Doing this is not a substitute for what a mono cartridge will do. The detail, musicality and quiet background that is characteristic of a mono cartridge will not happen by using a stereo cartridge, even with a splitter or a mono switch. Once you have a mono cartridge installed, then you may find that using the mono switch is preferable but that could go either way.
lewm
13,027 posts
 
Googyfoot, Based on all that has gone before in this thread, I am not sure how you arrived at the "understanding" you describe above.  What you wrote may fairly be characterized as your opinion.  In your 3rd sentence, you use the term "mono cartridge" without specifying which type.  I assume you refer to a "true mono" cartridge, best described by Intact Audio, one that cannot read vertical deflections of the cantilever for any of several reasons based on its construction.
More to discover