Monitors+Sub or Full Range Speakers???


If you keep the budget at $2000 retail or under what does everyone think is the better option. Also, assume it's for 2 channel only. Seems like the full range offers better integration and the monitors offer better accuracy. Which is best?
musiclover-duplicate-0

Showing 2 responses by sedond

at $2k retail, go for the monitors - ewe can always get a sub set-up at a later date, as budget allows. too many compromises at this price point for either full-range *or* monitor + subs (need two for audio), if ya insist on paying retail. - *my* opinion... doug
kev, you are right - up to a point. you need an *excellent* crossover, usually not found on active subs, and you need two subs. that way, no tweeking, once it's set-up properly. my sub system consists of a pair of vmps larger subs, a marchand xm-9 deluxe x-over (24db/octave, adjustable x-over frequency w/plug-in chips, adjustable volume for bass/treble/crossover-point), and a pair of bridged adcom gfa 555 amps. everything was purchased new, w/exception of one of the amps (the other, i paid $450 for, back in '84!). the total expenditure was ~$2400. the only time i've had to fiddle w/the x-over, was when changing the monitors. never had an integration problem w/this set-up. doug