I agree with Jim...
<< To summarize, it's "sweet," dynamic, and near-holographic, given appropriate source material. >>
I listened to Patricia barber's "Companion" last weekend, and I was amazed at how real it sounded. Good recordings sound unbelievable. Thankfully, I don't mind the bad recordings either. I listen to all kinds of music, and many aren't necessarrily "hi-fi". I listened to "Introducing The Sonics" (Beat Rocket /Sundazed pressing) a few nights ago and it was still very enjoyable. The recording is 35 years old, mono, and technologically disadvantaged (that's the nice way of saying "bad"), but it sounded as good as it possibly could. All of the energy was still there...just not, ironically, the sonics. I was really worried that improving the amp would take the fun out of the music, but I was very wrong. It does present many more details, but it remains very musical and involving. I didn't have that experience with some of the other amps I've tried.
<< To summarize, it's "sweet," dynamic, and near-holographic, given appropriate source material. >>
I listened to Patricia barber's "Companion" last weekend, and I was amazed at how real it sounded. Good recordings sound unbelievable. Thankfully, I don't mind the bad recordings either. I listen to all kinds of music, and many aren't necessarrily "hi-fi". I listened to "Introducing The Sonics" (Beat Rocket /Sundazed pressing) a few nights ago and it was still very enjoyable. The recording is 35 years old, mono, and technologically disadvantaged (that's the nice way of saying "bad"), but it sounded as good as it possibly could. All of the energy was still there...just not, ironically, the sonics. I was really worried that improving the amp would take the fun out of the music, but I was very wrong. It does present many more details, but it remains very musical and involving. I didn't have that experience with some of the other amps I've tried.