McIntosh vs. NAD vs. Audio Control


Hi Gang:
I'm looking for opinions. A power surge blew out my Sunfire preamp and I'm looking to replace it. (Yes, I upgraded my power surge protector to a Furman 15pfi)
I've narrowed down my options to the following:
McIntosh - MX122
NAD - M17 V2
Audio Control - Maestro M9
I know there is a price difference and different features (e.g., room correction, WIFI capability) but besides that, I'm looking for advantages and disadvantages. 
Thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.
Coloradojeff
coloradojeff

Showing 2 responses by caphill

Agreed with Audiotroy. 
Out of those 3 HT processors listed above I would say the Audio Control Maestro M9 would sound better than the other two processors. 
Audiotroy 

Yes the Audio Control Maestro M9 is quite spectacular for movies and is no doubt superior sounding to both the McIntosh MX122 & the NAD M17 v2. 
It'd be interesting to see how the Maestro M9 would stack up against the Lyngdorf MP-50 & the McIntosh MX160 and other high end processors. 

For my reference theater room setup I recently traded in the Lyngdorf MP-50 for the Trinnov Altitude and is definitely a step up performance wise. Before I had the Lyngdorf MP-50 I had been using the Classe SSP 800 for years and it was phenomenal sounding pre pro for both stereo music and surround movies. But I had been using it strictly for HT movies. 
The reason I sold the SSP 800 and bought the Lyngdorf was because I wanted Dolby Atmos, DTS-X.