McIntosh vs. Krell Comparison

I have owned both and still own Mcintosh. They are two great brands but couldn't be more different. To say one is better is a matter of taste. The Macs are more natural sounding - very quiet - and these models can drive anything. The Krell sound is very clear and detailed - almost too much for my taste - very bright with some speakers and an edge I find fatiguing through extended listening . If your speakers are not on the bright side then Krell may be to your liking. Both are built solid to give you lasting performance.

I used to reside in the Krell camp too but not anymore. I finally realized that for hifi, the highs did not have to hurt my ears. I have listened to many brands since I left Krell and have come to the conclusion that McIntosh is best for me. I listened to pretty much the entire Krell line and they all have that edgy brightness. As a result, I would go with the 1201s any day (and night).

I used to own Krell FPB 300 amp and KRC-3 pre and was very nice combo. Now own Mac MC2000 amp and Mac 100 pre. Which do I prefer...Mac. Very smooth and no, or at least less edginess of Krell. Of course tube amp vs. s.s. All a matter of taste and do I like those blue meters!

Stereophile's review of the 1201 thought that it had some upper end glare.