mcintosh mcd-1100 vs ayon cd5s, audio aero cpdplay

Orion, Posters are mostly likely to recommend the player they use and like. I like the CD-5s because it is superbly build and designed & has a warm, dynamic "live" sound with great resolution. I also think it offers tremendous value given you're getting a full tube dac, pre-amp & high end transport in one. The CD-5s is also hand-built in Austria. The mentioned AA is a great sounding player, though I have heard of some reliability issues with AA which is something to be mindful of. Re: the Mac, if you read the Dagogo review of the CD-5, Doug Schroeder said his friend's MCD-500 was not in the same league as the Ayon. Not sure how the MCD-1100 would compare to the CD-5s. Perhaps another AG'er can chime in?

Hi Audiofreak, I managed to dig out my old listening notes from the a-b-a test I did when I sold my old CD-5 vs the buyer's Audio Aero Prestige -

The buyer was using an Audio Aero Prestige player and we a-b-a tested it on the same music & the differences were certainly clear to me; the AA was more rolled off in comparison, the dac section was less detailed and accurate & the midrange was bloated. I also felt it had a 'sheen', like a veil clouding the music. The AA certainly sounded warm, though I felt that quality was compensating for omissions elsewhere. In comparison, the CD-5 had better weighted bass & extension, the above-mentioned veil was lifted, sound came from a dead quiet background & you then felt like the band were in the room playing for you. The buyer also noticed the improved detail and accuracy of the dac, whilst his wife noticed the above-mentioned veil being lifted, though on first impression said she preferred that quality in the AA.

...the end result? The buyer kept the Ayon and sold the AA.

Talk, sorry I don't have any experience with your Burmester or the Mac, hopefully some other members will post their experiences!