2. amps-preamps
  3. 153271-70972

McIntosh C45 - A truly hidden gem?

I am running a McIntosh C45 preamp with MC601's amps and XRT 28's speakers.

In the everlasting upgrade craze, I have now tried a Mcintosh C2200, C2300, C46, C47, C48 and C200 in my system and I keep going back to my beloved C45.

Is it just me or is the C45 an underrated performer?

In my system:
C2200 - Too tubey. Gorgeous vocals, not enough "oomph" with rock music.
C2300 - Gorgeous vocals, beautiful mid-bass, not enough "rock music" bass.
C46 - I didn't care for the equalizer much. Sound was pretty much identical to the C45
C47 - Great bass, great highs, mids - too fatiguing.
C48 - Too dark. Not as musical as the C45. took all the fun out fo my system.
C200 - Same as C48. Dark, quiet, great bass, not as musical in my opinion.

Has anyone else had the same experience with a C45?
yyman23

Showing 2 responses by yyman23

yyman23 OP
150 posts
 
Hi utep10,

I was commenting on the phono and line stage of both. I tried the DAC on both but my main usage is CD using unbalanced line in and Phono using the MM input.

If I may ad - I have since upgraded to a C2300 (giving it a second and better chance) and I love it! I do have a C47 and C45 for sale if you're interested.

Thank you.

yyman23 OP
150 posts
 
I really like the 3D sound of it. If you stand in the sweet spot you can swear that the vocals are coming from the center, like there's a hidden center speaker in between the mains.
The highs and mids are very sweet and non fatiguing. I like having analog Bass/Treble knobs. I wish it had a bit more mid-bass, but the pros outweigh the cons soundwise.
I use it solely for 2-channel stereo. The TM-1 tuner module is installed, radio sounds good but I'm no good judge - most of my listening is to records and cds.
More to discover