McIntosh and Brystons: Fair comparison ?

My experience Bryston sst series on are as good as Ive heard. They have no hint of harshness and attack like the did with the st series and back. If I was going to move away from "budget" gear again, Id grab a newer Bryston again(I won't).

I've had the opportunity to use both.
I've used a 4B-SST(for about three years) and now use a McIntosh MC352 in my main system.
Both are well made, excellent sounding amps. However,the Bryston presents a much different sonic picture than the McIntosh. Without dissing the Bryston, (unlike some in this thread do to McIntosh), I would have to say it has a brighter,perhaps even an etched quality,especially in the treble region. The McIntosh is way more neutral sounding,Is it softer, rounder?...yes, but not dull in any way. I'd say more musical and far more listenable than the Bryston.

Davvie, I've heard both (Bryston/Mac) as well and couldn't agree more! See my post above if you like...
What speakers were you using to compare amps?

Dordevic,At the time I had the Bryston and then the McIntosh amp, I was using Legacy Focus speakers. I would consider them to be excellent sounding.I would have kept them but just could not tame there low-end response in my listening room. Three 12in. woofers per side was just too much to deal with.I'm now using Tyler Acoustics Woodmeres.

Ultimate tweek #1
All I know is that butter smeared on my speaker cables make the sound smoother and faster and taste better.
Just like 2k cables sound way better than $500 cables.