McCormack MAP-1 update


I had posted here about a month ago with concerns about integrating this unit to pass bass to a biamped system in both 2 ch and multichan. Your responses that I could use simple Y-splitters to accomplish what I wanted were very helpful, and I was encouraged to post a follow-up. (the original thread seems to have been deleted).

I did buy the MAP-1 and am using Y-splitters to pass signal from the LF and RF outs to both high and low freq amps with fine success. Steve McCormack also checked in with me to ensure that all my questions were answered, which was deeply appreciated.

The sound quality of this unit in my system has exceeded my high expectations. I have had a tubed preamp for 2 channel, and thought the MAP-1 would be unlikely to supplant it for stereo. However, the MAP has proved to be every bit as musical and involving, while astonishing me with much more resolution of detail, and eliminating listening fatigue which I had previously thought a speaker issue. If there is anything that the tubed unit does better, I haven't identified it yet because I'm enjoying the McCormack too much to do further A/B right now.
bbeezley

Showing 1 response by jafox

Great to hear of your success, but it would be nice to know which tube preamp you are comparing with the MAP-1. I too am thinking about a MAP-1 but it is hard to imagine it bringing on the magic of a tube preamp like my BAT 31SE or previously owned, ARC LS5 III. Some tube preamps are absolutely phenomenol and others are downright terrible so knowing which model you are talking about would give the readers here a reference point.
John