Martin logans or Dali Euphonia

IMHO, the two speaker lines sound nothing alike. The Euphonias are nice as are the MLs (I've had MLs and have listened to the Euphonias several times). If you get many responses, it will be completely based on personal preference and will be EXTREMELY system-dependent. WAF is completely different as well if that's a factor...

For what it is worth, I would personally tilt towards the MLs with high-powered tube amplification, assuming that your room is up to the task. For the same money, I might choose something else. Then again, I prefer chocolate ice cream to vanilla, don't really like bruce springsteen, and am a morning person rather than an evening person. That and 59 yen gets you a 59 yen hamburger at McD's where I live... :^)

I apologize if my first post was a bit trite. I must admit to being surprised by the question because I find the two speakers present music so differently.

I agree with Darrell that the MLs are far more transparent, soundstaging is better (if well set-up), and the crossover is single-point rather than multiple point which can make a difference. As Darrell noted, set up is all important with MLs - in my opinion the biggest reason why ML owners switch is that they have not set them up properly. If properly done (set-up, upstream component matching, proper cabling, room treatments), MLs really sound wonderful. The Dalis are nice but I have not had a "magic moment" with them the way I have many times with MLs.