Clew- Which do you value more, music, or HT or multi-channel sound effects? If music is what reaches your soul, then shouldn't that be your primary concern? "Matched speakers" and "THX" labels won't guarantee better emotional connection with a musical performance. If you get your primary speakers and amplification at your required level, then the rest is simply icing for the visual distraction that HT provides. I would agree that the Martin Logans do justify better amplfication than what receivers provide. However, finding a decent pre/processor and/or, at least, a good quality amplifier for your mains isn't difficult, especially on this site. The rest of the HT audio equipment fundamentally only needs to avoid being annoying. I'm just an old audiophile that loves music, and merely enjoys HT. The choice should follow that which moves you, not magazines, marketing, or me. Good luck.
Martin Logan Aeons help?
Has anyone heard anything about these speakers? I have tried to find reviews online and there just aren't any (search via google). I am trying to make a pretty tough decision based on the review and maybe your help as well. I own a pair that are about a year old and I think they have really good sound. However, I don't know if I can afford to keep them given that I have heard that they are expensive to match to both components and other speakers (for both home theater and stereo use). My current receive is pretty weak for this speaker (Denon AVR-3300) and I am thinking of upgrading, but it seems like everything is around 2-5k for something that will do them justice. Any thoughts here or something that I may be missing? I listen to blues, rock, and some jazz. I have been thinking of selling them and getting some B&W CDM9NTs (cheaper to match with other speakers) or maybe the Revel F30s. Any thoughts or comments would be very appreciated!!
- ...
- 14 posts total
- 14 posts total