Mark Levinson 436 Monos vs. Classe CA-401 stereo ?


I have a Classe CA-401 amplifier. Very nice 400wpc stereo amp with good midrange and decent upper end. Not a whole lot on the lower end. The dual mono design is on a single chassis and I'd venture to say it is about 4 years old.

I'm considering changing to Mark Levinson 436 mono amps. These are true monoblock 2-chassis desgin with 350wpc each and would be a bit newer model, even though I'm considering buying used.

My speakers are Piega P10 and Mark Levinson No.39 CD player.

Can anyone suggest the pros and cons of the Levinson amp or which direction I should look to for my upgrade. Thanks.
3zub

Showing 2 responses by todds7

Greetings to you. Have you been happy with your 401? I was thinking of getting one. I may more realistically end us with a Classe CA-400, but I was curious about the 401 -- lacking a bit in bass? It should have it all for the price!!

Thanks, fellow enthusiast.
Thanks for your responses, guys. I actually did buy a CA400. I've been very pleased with it. It was relatively inexpensive and, like the Classe line as a whole, has a great reputation for reliability. The sound? "Pretty darned good," but by no means "the final word in sound reproduction". Kurt Tank: I've heard (read) quite a bit about the Lamms. I'm intrigued, but may have to win a small lottery before getting any of them. I hope some day to hear them. Sgr: Good advice. I've read and re-read your thoughts. Cheers.