No, but the huge difference here is going to be in low-frequency isolation, and whether your application even benefits from that. Being a "hard" interface, the Magicos won’t touch low frequencies. The killer application of Townshend is for turntables, where this matters a lot - and I’ve used them here; they’re great. I don’t really see a convincing arguments for or against with Townshend applied to speakers, though I know they push hard for this in their marketing. Frankly, I’m not putting tall & heavy speakers on springs no matter what they say.
Meanwhile, Magico is pushing constrained layer damping’s ability to convert vibration energy into heat. But has there EVER been any study into how effective this actually is? What % gets converted to heat before it passes through the interface ONE TIME (not "many" times, as that’s too late)? I’m skeptical that this is very much at all, and that effective isolation is about redirecting energy much more than it is about conversion into heat (I'm sure their feet achieve redirection too, at least for some frequencies).