Maggie owners (past, present, future) what do (did) you love and or dislike about them?


I've always owned dynamic speakers, but I'm ready for something different. I remember about 15 years ago auditioning a pair of Maggie's at a small shop on the Plaza. Don't remember the model but I was astounded by the clarity. Couldn't afford them then, had 2 kids in college. Presently own a pair of Monitor Audio Gold 300's and they're very good speakers, but I've been reminiscing about the clarity of those Maggie's and I want a pair of the 3.7i's. Those of you who have experience with Maggie's let me know your love (hate) relationship with them. My room is 17 x 15 with a sloping ceiling up to 10 feet. Is that enough room for the 3.7i's to perform at their best?
mewsickbuff

Showing 1 response by electroslacker

I only had the MG 2a's, which I loved owning, but IMHO, Maggie's are speakers that often sound better at the store or at shows because their reasonable price makes them attractive to those who don't allocate the funds for the amps that they need.  That was me. I had 100 wpc Sansui BA-2000 amp, but not the right 100 wpc.

I went onto Martin Logan Quests, which were more ballsy,  but have moved on to 40 inch tall dynamic floorstanders because instruments and voices have the right "in the room" size..  A triangle is believable in size as well as sonics.  Same for singers, drum kits, trumpets and the rest.  To me, you lose that proper sizing from five or six foot diaphragms.