Live vs Recording


I heard a magnificent performance of The Brahms 1st last night by the Milwaukee SO.
Returning home still high from it, I put my fav LP of the 1st on(Klemperer/Philh.) and was really surprised how close it came to the live performance on my modest system.
Eastern Electric Avant pre
AVA Synergy 450 amp
Castle Harlech speakers
modded Sony x7 with Nagoka MP 200
PS Audio GCPH phono stage
MIT Cvt-2 IC's and SC

I believe it was due in large part to both the EE Avant and the PS phono having phase switches which, to my ears anyway, made a large difference .
Also the Castles being about 92 db efficent in my room made me regret my long addiction to Maggies on those climaxes !

Comments please ?
schubert

Showing 2 responses by almarg

Re phase inversion switches: A point that should be kept in mind is that when the setting of the switch is changed not only is the signal being inverted, but the configuration of the circuit that is being used within the component is also being changed. In some designs an active stage might even be inserted or removed as a function of the switch position, with significant sonic consequences.

Perhaps that kind of design dependency is one reason opinions tend to be divided about the efficacy and usefulness of phase inversion switches. In addition, of course, to the differences in approaches to mic'ing and mixing that occur among different recordings, genres, labels, etc.

Regards,
-- Al
Thanks, Schubert. I neglected to mention, btw, that Brahms 1st is, simply put, my favorite symphony. I don't own and haven't heard the Klemperer; I'll have to add it to my near term purchase list.

Among those recordings I am familiar with, my favorite in terms of performance is the Toscanini/NBC Symphony recording from 1940. My favorite in terms of sonics + performance is the Horenstein/LSO, on Chesky CD19 (unfortunately out of print, but available at high prices).

Regards,
-- Al