Lightspeed Attenuator - Best Preamp Ever?


The question is a bit rhetorical. No preamp is the best ever, and much depends on system context. I am starting this thread beacuase there is a lot of info on this preamp in a Music First Audio Passive...thread, an Slagle AVC Modules...thread and wanted to be sure that information on this amazing product did not get lost in those threads.

I suspect that many folks may give this preamp a try at $450, direct from Australia, so I thought it would be good for current owners and future owners to have a place to describe their experience with this preamp.

It is a passive preamp that uses light LEDs, rather than mechanical contacts, to alter resistance and thereby attenuation of the source signal. It has been extremely hot in the DIY community, since the maker of this preamp provided gernerously provided information on how to make one. The trick is that while there are few parts, getting it done right, the matching of the parts is time consuming and tricky, and to boot, most of use would solder our fingers together if we tried. At $450, don't bother. It is cased in a small chassis that is fully shielded alloy, it gets it's RF sink earth via the interconnects. Vibration doesn't come into it as there is nothing to get vibrated as it's passive, even the active led's are immune as they are gas element, no filaments. The feet I attach are soft silicon/sorbethane compound anyway just in case.

This is not audio jewelry with bling, but solidly made and there is little room (if any) for audionervosa or tweaking.

So is this the best preamp ever? It might be if you have a single source (though you could use a switch box), your source is 2v or higher, your IC from pre-amp to amp is less than 2m to keep capaitance low, your amp is 5kohm input or higher (most any tube amp), and your amp is relatively sensitive (1v input sensitivity or lower v would be just right). In other words, within a passive friendly system (you do have to give this some thought), this is the finest passive preamp I have ever heard, and I have has many ranging form resistor-based to TVCs and AVCs.

In my system, with my equipment, I think it is the best I have heard passive or active, but I lean towards prefering preamp neutrality and transparency, without loosing musicality, dynamics, or the handling of low bass and highs.

If you own one, what are your impressions versus anything you have heard?

Is it the best ever? I suspect for some it may be, and to say that for a $450 product makes it stupidgood.
pubul57

Showing 6 responses by erwann

Hi George,

I've been enjoying your Lightspeed Attenuator for three days now, and it prompts the following remarks.

As a lifetime analog fan, I only lately invested in a truly great CD player, an oppo 95 with Ric Schultz's all-out mods, only to discover that the digital volume control noticeably degrades information at lower -and what I would consider reasonable- levels. Additionally, the increments are less than subtle, and the lowest audible setting is still too loud for my taste. A friend told me that digital volume controls deserve to be banned. I concur.

In my experience a system's ability to resolve lower levels is essential. Not being the diy type, I started looking at stepped attenuators that plug directly into the amp output, and therefore would require one less interconnect. The only two I found, Ric Schultz and Scott Endler's, were unfortunately no longer made, and TVC's have their own issues. After discovering your LightsSpeed Attenuator on diyaudio.com, I ordered one a couple of weeks ago, which arrived safely ten days later.

I think the best way for me to describe the LightSpeed is that with the CD volume control set to maximum, I can now listen to my interconnects, not to the unit itself, because in every respect -style, size, sound, and setup- , it simply stands out of the way. I power it with an older car battery. It's always difficult to describe a product which has no characteristics of its own, whose presence is in its seeming absence, which adds or subtracts nothing, but the end result is that I now listen far more often to far more music which is far more enjoyable. For $450 I'm finally experiencing the full potential of what I consider to be an exceptional CD player, which now comes very, very close to my $15,000 analog source. I have yet to try the LightSpeed on the REC OUT of my phono preamp, probably because I am enjoying it so much on digital.

The only limitations I can think of, have nothing to do with the sound: leaving the volume control half-way to extend the life of the optoisolators took some getting used to, and indeed the lowest setting lets will let some minimal signal through, which compared to my previous setup, however, is well within my tolerance, and greatly superior to my earlier direct CD to amp connection. The overall experience is far beyond my expectation. This is a product that I will not be parting with, period.

You asked about the volume setting for normal loud listening with the Oppo at full. It's at ten of twelve maximum. If I want to increase that setting, I can then use the remote on the oppo while retaining excellent definition.
Hi George,

I just had a quick glance at the Audiogon thread to figure out whether I can find a better power supply than my decommissioned Prius auxiliary battery, and I fail to understand how a Teradak, with or without a fancy cord, could offer an improvement other than convenience. I guess the answer is that you haven't felt an overwhelming urge to try it yourself. Not being an exhibitionist, I personally think that my best audio component is my brain with ear input, which in addition to being portable and self-powered, doubles as the biggest sex organ, but I'm still burning it in at sixty-six, and it keeps improving.
My analog front end is a vintage Verdier driving a London Decca Reference cartridge on a Cartridge Man Air Bearing tonearm. With its 5 mv output the Decca is not exactly shy, so signal strength is not a concern with the LightSpeed .

I use the phono stage of a modded EL34 type Scott amp, which in terms of what I would consider absolute musical value, is without peer. The ability to further tap that value upstream via the REC OUT into the LightSpeed Attenuator is the equivalent of adding Bybee Golden Goddess 'Super Effect' Speaker Bullets, which to me, was a revelation, and is of the same order of magnitude as being able to bypass that dismal digital attenuator on my Oppo, whose potential has finally materialized.

For me, pace and tone are paramount, and trump imaging any time. Music is not about hollow graphic photography, but about living the performance. The Lightspeed clarifies intention and complex interdependence between notes the way a juggler keeps his balls, up in the air where they belong (sorry about that).

Insofar as the only weakness of the Lightspeed is the additional interconnects required, time permitting I hope to experiment with the diy version of the Tempo Electric Aurum Ag Hybrid interconnects, which should do justice to this exceptional little gem.
Hi George,

I don't use the Isolator cartridge/headshell de-coupler pictured at
http://www.blackpearls-shop.de/DECCA-AEC-LONDON-REFERENCE-TONABNEHMER

Instead, I couple the Decca to the arm and the arm to the 'table with Mapleshade's Nanomount System,
(http://shop.mapleshadestore.com/prodinfo.asp?number=NANOMOUNT).

Mapleshade's no-nonsense vibration control products shame anything else for a fraction of the price, which is exactly what you've managed to do. Its founder, Pierre Sprey, fathered the legendary A-10 Warthog, recently rescued from extinction by Congress. It's the only USAF aircraft designed solely for close air support capable of extended loitering over the battlefield, to devastating effect, again for a fraction of the price of an F-35. Have a look at this: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/01/a-10-f-35-air-force-budget.

Your LightSpeed is the stealth version A-10 of the audio battlefield. Simply devastating!
This is vintage EU mind control: identify genuine existential problems, say the girth of bananas, to justify a metastatic bureaucracy, whose days, judging by the latest EU Parliament elections, are numbered.
Graham Slee's 2006 interview with TNT (http://www.tnt-audio.com/edcorner/july06.html) offers an eye-opening overview of the stark implications of RoHS for small to medium businesses, best summed up by his assessment that "all this legislation has a soul destroying effect on the designer who tries so incredibly hard to share his/her talents with the music lover, only to be shunned by what would seem to be ruthless dictators." Amen!!!