Lector CDP 7 Mk I, II or III ?


I plan to part with my second system Ayre gear to refinance a purchase for the main system and am considering to retain only the Yamamoto headphones with another good cdp. And so I came accross Lector, unknown on the local market and thus even more interesting.

Now, I did a search on Agon and found several people specifically advising the CDP 7 Mk I, clearly prefering it over the later versions.

Is the original Lector CDP 7 sonically better? Any specific reason for that?

Thanks in advance
Karel
karelfd

Showing 2 responses by mrtennis

the mimetism seems to be a solid state cd player, while the lectors are tube-based.

does the mimetism sound more tube like than lector ?

if not in what way is it superior to the lector ?

my friend has a lector 7 --not the mk ii or mk iii.

there is one for sale on audiogon. i have been tempted, but am leaning toward an amr.
hi fafafion:

who carries this product ? is there a us importer ?

the virtue of the lector is its very romantic and forgiving character. i would describe it as a euphonic presentation.

most 24 bit players are not forgiving of problem recordings. the 20 bit lector has the advantage of not upsampling.