Interesting. I had the SCD1 and found it inferior significantly to the Naim CDSII and to the Levinson 360S it was driving. For SACD playback, it was very good. Since I own 2000 CDs I figure I'd go for the best CD playback possible. It's also possible that the rhythmic musicality and beat of the Naim meshes well with my system. I hear that the newer SACD players, particularly from Marantz are getting better and better. The catch is that as the digital parts get better, the mechanicals usually go down hill. FWIW it's worth a friend who has a heavily modified Sony (not sure which one, I have to go over to listen to it) raves about it. For looks the SCD1 can't be beat; but I wish they would have put the aluminum fascia all the way around and that 30 second delay and the fact that the display stays (comes back) on when the CD stops is annoying...
Latest Score on SACD for Redbook Playback??
I have had a deposit on an Sony SCD-1 which I hope represents good value at < $3000. I like the fact that it seems to be an overbuilt, flagship product and performs well with redbook CDs. Also, the 2 channel configuration appeals to my snobby, retro, dinosaur audiophile side. However, I was a little confused scanning the new Stereophile which suggests that will be discontinued and I am wondering how the multichannel SACD players perform on redbook CDs. Should I still buy the SCD-1? Do I need an external DAC for redbook happiness? If so, could someone please tell me what DAC could be used with the Sony as a transport for the best redbook performance? Is upsampling important in your opinion? Thank you very much.
6 responses Add your response