Krell KSA-150 vs. Simaudio W-3... + ??? pre-amp


After looking at some choices for new integrated amps, I decieded to look at used separates that go for around the same price together. I have liked the Krell KSA series since it came out, but I have recently discovered Simaudio. From what I have read it would seem that the Simaudio is a bit more refined and has a warmer sound. Does anyone have addional thoughts on this. The Krell KSA-150 and the Simaudio W-3 are about the same price used.

Also, what would be a good solid state (for reliability) pre-amp that I could find used for $1000 or less. The only one I am considering at the moment is the Acoustic Research LS-9, but I need some more suggestions. I do not have much experience in this area.

What would a tube pre-amp do for this system; a tube pre-amp with a solid state amp? What are the reliability concerns that deal with buying tubes used?

Please look at my other recent post http://forum.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/fr.pl?aamps&1054507262&openusid&zzKey_metric&4&5#Key_metric for a description of my musical tastes and situation.
key_metric

Showing 1 response by drguayo

I personally believe the Krell is much superior to the Simaudio. Due to it's pure Class A topology it is a much faster amp. True the Simaudio is a bit warmer but a good tube preamp would warm up the KRELL sound. Tube preamps do not have the maintenance costs of tube amps - tube replacement is less frequent and much less expensive than power tubes. I ran Krell KMA-100's with an Audio Research LS15(w remote) with great results. You may be able to pick up an AR LS15 w/remote for $1000 - they go for $1350 mint - ones with a bit of cosmetic flaws could be found within your budget. BTW I still have my LS15 and am very happy with it - it is now paired with a Rowland amp - very synergistic combination.