Krell, Krc-3, Krc, and Krc-Hr "What's your taste"


Gretting's Friends,
Iam in the transition of up-grading my pre amp. For the last 5 years i've owned a krc-3, I know for fact that the Krc-Hr, is superior, but what about the Krc?? compaired to the Krc-3 and Krc-Hr. Or should I just keep my Krc-3 and feel blessed. Also I have a Krell Kav 250 cd player looking to move up to a Kav-300. Here again would it be worth the trouble?? Let me know what you think! you guys have always been very helpful in the past, Thanks again.
regards
aoltes
aoltes

Showing 1 response by huntermusic

I had my system configured with Krell 400cx amp and Krell KPS-25sc with Siltech CAST cables and a Siltech powercord on the KPS. I bought a Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista SACD player. There was no doubt that the Musical Fidelity player sounded much better on Redbook (regular) CD playback. It was simply a question of older technology being surpassed by newer. It was not a subjective asessment; it was clear. So I decided to sell the KPS and buy a KCT preamp now that I did not need the CD/preamp combo. I auditioned the KCT in my system with CAST but I also auditioned a Pass X-1 preamp with Purist Audio Venustas IC cables. It was a blow away. The Pass sounded that much better than the KCT. Quieter,, more dynamic, loads more detail, wider soundstage; in every way more musical and more alive sounding. But I still have my Krell 400cx. I also have their newest DVD player.

I love Krell the company. Their service has always been so sharp. People there are smart, nice, and the turnaround is fast. But the audiophile world is so competitive and I can only tell you what my ears told me.

By the way SACD is truly the way to go and greatly superior to REdbook CD.
I encourage you to listen to the format.