2. analog
  3. 1394259610

Kl Audio LP200 ultrasonic record cleaner insights

I did a bit of research a few months ago on the Audio Desk ultrasonic cleaner and thats where I found out about the KL Audio CLN LP200unit. I was attracted to the much more powerful motor, no rollers to replace and using distilled water rather than a cleaner.

Let me start that I have a Loricraft and used the Walker 4 step program but shortened it to a clean\rinse setup. Still ten undivided minutes of your time a side to clean. After a while I didnt bother with mint or new records.

Table Galibier Gavia, Triplanar Arm, Zyx Universe cartridge

I have quckly and efficiently cleaned more records in 3 weeks than I have for the three years I have had the Loricraft. And it was hardly an inconvienance, not a major chore

I have cleaned a number of Walker\Loricraft records again with the KL Audio. The results are jaw dropping. Dead quiet, no static pops (sometimes dont even zerostat). The biggest issue is resolution, getting down and removing that last bit of material and the resolution, body, separation of instruments, timing, passion and air around the notes is enhanced. Modest pressing sound like audiophile. I have ran into a few noisy records, probably dug out by the last stylus but most everything else has been so overwhelming. Low level detail is to die for.

The machine is a tank. Everything impeccably manufacturered. You can set the ultrasonic to 1-5 minutes and the drying 2-4 minutes I spit out a record every 5 minutes while I watch tv from the next room. It drys very effectively but isnt that loud

This machine is not cheap at $4k but what it does is like a very serious component upgrade. Highly recommended for someone with a serious vinyl collection and setup
128x128audiotomb

Showing 2 responses by jtimothya

jtimothya
612 posts
 
One thing I did motice is that Klaudio does not remove oil or finger print easily from the record. When I was cleaning the tecords, my finger soiled the record and I could see the big finger print that looks oily. I cleaned that record four times again and the finger print was still visible.

This is where I wonder if the Audio Desk Systeme might do a better job cleaning than the KLAudio because the ADS unit uses a cleaning agent (surfactant?) and scrubs the record with its rollers.

Without claiming any science nor wanting to start a foodfight, it just 'seems like' cavitation + soap + scrubbing would do a better job than cavitation alone.

Who knows if that amounts to a practical difference.

 
jtimothya
612 posts
 
Fingerprints are uninteresting, that is a visual disturb only.

Whether from fingerprints or otherwise, grease and oil are not unique to a record's surface and both attract dirt.

For the sake of balance, what I read is the current Audio Desk is quite reliable.
 
More to discover