King of the Hill


So some people have the latest and greatest chips,wires,clocks,transports and designs.Killer,Olympic,Top shelf,Untouchable on all levels,King of the Hill.Sooooo, if their ears are just average,help me out here Doctor,and are a definate part of the hearing experience,what exactly does that say about their opinions.Is it better to have the greatest ears and average gear or great gear and average ears.Yes,we all want the greatest of everything from AC outlet to ears,but if we are all lacking in one area of the auditory chain,whom can we beleive?Your thoughts mean alot to me,but nothing to the Krell,cheers,Bob
usblues

Showing 1 response by jndean

Thanks,Nrchy. I have copied your post to hang on my amplifier and to read daily. It sounds like your opinion comes from pain and experience. There is ,however, no promise that pain and experience lead to contentment. My goal is to continue to be satisfied with high value gear from PSB, Marantz , and Kimber.
It's hard when one reads Audiogon every day.
jndean