Kharma Ceramique; evolution of the line

I have had the luck to find a 1.0 pair and love them dearly.The best thng i can say is they all sound very much alike. Each version is just a bit better all around and the larger will fill larger room requirements.The # 1.1 2.1 3.1 and 3.2 etc versions are improvements to each type.I purchased the 1.0 do to having a large room( apx. 600sq.ft.)
If you have smaller room requirements you could go to the next smaller size. They all have the Magic Midrange,that everyone mentions.Very easy to drive and a joy to listen too.Hope this helps!

Thorman, thanks. I own the 2.2s and am thrilled with them. They're perfect for my room.

I'm looking for specifics about the changes made to these models as the line has evolved.

OK, here goes:

1.0 - 1.1: There were changes to the crossover as well as new binding posts.

2.0 - 2.1: A completely new crossover was implemented. It raises the impedence of the speaker as well as the efficiency up to 90db. The 2.0 was a bit dark sounding and with the implemented changes it became closer to the 1.0's.

2.1 - 2.2: There were changes to the crossover as well as new binding posts.

3.0 - 3.1: A completely new crossover was implemented. It raises the impedence of the speaker as well as the efficiency from 86db up to 90db.

3.1 - 3.2: Internal cabinet improvements. Better bracing, damping and doping. Improved tweeter. Internal wire is upgraded from Supreme Reference to Grand Reference.

Hope that helps.

Thanks!