What you describe as the sound you heard from the ESL is completely contrary to my experience hearing ML speakers in general. Even my ~20 year old Aerius i model sounds extremely transparent and dynamic especially from mid-bass and up. They do need to be paired with a proper amplifier and are somewhat placement sensitive to deliver good sound so I suspect the receiver and room placement combined caused the sound you heard. No experience with the 60xt.
Just auditioned Martin Logan ESL vs 60xt
I just left my Best Buy Magnolia HT and did A/B comparisons between these two speakers. I really wanted to walk away shocked at the ESL electrostatics but was left very disappointed. They were just muddy and boring compared to the 60xts right next to them. It was as if someone turned off the tweeter too. I felt like there was almost nothing over 7k hz like cymbals, upper guitar string plucks, etc.
Now, the 60xts did sound muddy in male vocals down low but they definitely peaked my interest more than the electrostatics.
Now, if I ONLY owned the ESL's, I'd probably be happy, get used to the sound and think they sound good. We're all subject to that trickery, but I just thought there should be more..
I was listening to some of my favorite tracks through Tidal, into a Marantz sr7705 receiver..
I know the amp/situation wasn't perfect but the sonic characteristics between the two would be unchanged in a more optimal situation.
Anyone else kinda feel this way?
Now, the 60xts did sound muddy in male vocals down low but they definitely peaked my interest more than the electrostatics.
Now, if I ONLY owned the ESL's, I'd probably be happy, get used to the sound and think they sound good. We're all subject to that trickery, but I just thought there should be more..
I was listening to some of my favorite tracks through Tidal, into a Marantz sr7705 receiver..
I know the amp/situation wasn't perfect but the sonic characteristics between the two would be unchanged in a more optimal situation.
Anyone else kinda feel this way?