Noise floor and dynamic ranging capacity have little to do with being able to hear jitter in a signal. The two have no direct correlation, only minimal aspects of correlation.
Reclockers or reclocking designs, chips, circuits and said implementations of such... can make for worse jitter going in (to the dacs proper), than was originally received from the given source point, so one has to be careful. Re-clocking is not a wonder ointment cure-all. It is generally considered to be a good idea but it does, or can... create a brick wall jitter reduction effect, that the reclocker is then crowned the king of jitter issues for that system.
Being able to hear jitter changes as pass through from the one device to another, is a good sign, generally (but only possibly!), that less jitter harm is being done by the receiver as the jitter changes upstream are not being swamped by intrinsic jitter noise, but it does not mean that intrinsic jitter problems of the receiver do not exist. It means there is some minimal transparency aspects. For better or for worse.
Meaning, in clarity, that when I read about a device having a reclocker that offers low jitter, and it is stated that it ’fixes everything’... I remain wary and suspect of it’s purchase and/or use, as this means I’m quite possibly brick-walled in my attempts to try and fix jitter in the entire final usable pathway, via upgrades in source point or digital cable choices. But again, only possibly. It all remains as a crap shoot. Nothing new.....
Reclockers or reclocking designs, chips, circuits and said implementations of such... can make for worse jitter going in (to the dacs proper), than was originally received from the given source point, so one has to be careful. Re-clocking is not a wonder ointment cure-all. It is generally considered to be a good idea but it does, or can... create a brick wall jitter reduction effect, that the reclocker is then crowned the king of jitter issues for that system.
Being able to hear jitter changes as pass through from the one device to another, is a good sign, generally (but only possibly!), that less jitter harm is being done by the receiver as the jitter changes upstream are not being swamped by intrinsic jitter noise, but it does not mean that intrinsic jitter problems of the receiver do not exist. It means there is some minimal transparency aspects. For better or for worse.
Meaning, in clarity, that when I read about a device having a reclocker that offers low jitter, and it is stated that it ’fixes everything’... I remain wary and suspect of it’s purchase and/or use, as this means I’m quite possibly brick-walled in my attempts to try and fix jitter in the entire final usable pathway, via upgrades in source point or digital cable choices. But again, only possibly. It all remains as a crap shoot. Nothing new.....