I suggest buy the one sounds best to you. For a tube amp, VAC is relatively low maintenance. Replace output tubes periodically and if one blows, replace along with a fuse.
Sigma 160iSE has only 4 output tubes so heat is probably not an issue and inexpensive to replace when worn.
If you're considering 625, definitely checkout VAC 170iq and 200iq. You can roll KT88. KT120 and KT150, real time biasing and when an output tube blows, IQ system trips before blowing a fuse so just replace the bad tube. I know an experience audiophile has 2 200IQs and found them a big improvement over previous models.
If I was in the market for tube amps in this price range, 2 200IQs will be HIGH on my list.
Aeris DAC can drive amps directly so only you can decide if a preamp is necessary. I always prefer a preamp in the chain.
I have an all tube system so would go for VAC.. Summer is here and last night I rotate SS amp back in the system. It sounds excellent but NO magic. SQ will improve when the tube amp sound is no longer fresh in my mind ... happens every summer. :-):-)
Sigma 160iSE has only 4 output tubes so heat is probably not an issue and inexpensive to replace when worn.
If you're considering 625, definitely checkout VAC 170iq and 200iq. You can roll KT88. KT120 and KT150, real time biasing and when an output tube blows, IQ system trips before blowing a fuse so just replace the bad tube. I know an experience audiophile has 2 200IQs and found them a big improvement over previous models.
If I was in the market for tube amps in this price range, 2 200IQs will be HIGH on my list.
Aeris DAC can drive amps directly so only you can decide if a preamp is necessary. I always prefer a preamp in the chain.
I have an all tube system so would go for VAC.. Summer is here and last night I rotate SS amp back in the system. It sounds excellent but NO magic. SQ will improve when the tube amp sound is no longer fresh in my mind ... happens every summer. :-):-)