James Randi vs. Anjou Pear - once and for all

Mr. Randi's challenge reminds me of when people claimed you can't tell one beer from another when tasting them blindfolded. Some can, some can't.

He'll admit $50/meter Monster Cable sounds better than $1.50/meter Home Depot zip wire, yet many folks would say you're insane to pay $50 for a piece of wire.

So is his argument you can't hear a difference between any cable or you just can't hear a $7500 difference? If it's the first, then he's just dead-flat wrong. Otherwise, there wouldn't be a Monster Cable or a Cardas or a Pear Audio. If it's the second than he's simply questioning a company's justification for its profit margin. And that's none of his business. If I'm rich and stoopid enough to pay $7500 for some fancy wire because I I think it will help me reach audio nirvana, than that validates companies like Pear who cater to my (foolish) whimsy.

All said and done, it's a mix of reality and placebo effect. You can hear a difference between $50 cable and $7500 cable, partially because you want to. As Mr. Randi knows, perception can determine reality.

Indeed, given the conviction with which many people talk about extremely high cost cables, break-in and other questionable tweaks...surely someone would step up to the plate, for a million bucks!

I can see why an editor or reviewer might not want to risk their reputation though.

However, surely the people who manufacture these amazing products would want to step up to the plate, defend their products and collect a cool million...all at the same time!!!

Perhaps manufacturers/dealers on this site, upon reading this thread, will post correspondence of their multiple attempts to set up a scientific test and secure the cool million dollar prize from Randi.

If Randi shows evidence that he is unwilling or evasive to oblige then it would at least cast doubt on his aspersions about "cable nonsense"....unchallenged Randi must be taken seriously.