www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/
Find that 4k, streaming, and MQA all share a single purpose: copyright control.
Is this MQA news a big deal?
Here's a summary of issues surrounding MQA that agrees with both of you and makes an essential point: there was no need for MQA in the first place. The author has spent serious time with the issue. www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/ Find that 4k, streaming, and MQA all share a single purpose: copyright control. |
ejr1953: In a related vein, have compared a number of (same recording) CDs with SACDs and found that the latter are normally louder and more compressed. Have often wondered if Sony did this as a standard mastering technique in order to prove the superiority of the format; listeners often assume that louder feeds sound higher in quality. Have also compared DSD feeds with 24/96 PCM ones and cannot tell any difference with my ears. A very helpful CD/BluRay in this regard is the LSO/Davis recording of the Nielsen symphonies that contains the original recording (24/192 PCM and DSD) in DSD, Flac, 24/96 PCM, CD, and MP3 formats. Was done several years ago and, so, does not include MQA. A great way to make up your own mind and on your own system about the various file formats. |