Is the KAB Fluid Damper worth it if...

I think most 1200 users agree that the best upgrade for the Technics is the Sumiko headshell. At $40, it's also the most inexpensive.

http://www.needledoctor.com/Sumiko-HS12-Headshell?sc=2&category=432

I believe the fluid damper only makes a big difference when using finnicky cartridges that cost far more than the SL-1200 itself, like low-compliance, low-output moving coils. So if, as you say, you plan to use a high-end cartridge, then absolutely, go for it. I find Denon MC cartridges pair very well with the SL-1200. The most popular pairing is with the DL-103 and DL-103R (which perform beyond their modest price tags) but the $950 DL-S1 is one of the greatest steals in all of audio. Just some suggestions.

Try the Sumiko first. I consider it essential so regardless of whether you do the fluid damper or not, it won't be a wasted purchase.

Ed, in past times you were pretty enthusiastic about the DL-160 on the SL-1200, a little less so about the DL-103. How has that changed for you in the last 2-3 years.

Since I discovered the SL-1200, I've found that, at least on bulletin boards and discussion forums, that "the most popular pairing is with the DL-103 and DL-103R." I was just stating what I believe the be a fact, not my personal opinion. I still prefer the DL-110/DL-160 to the DL-103 because I like the additional detail their more sophisticated cantilevers/styli provide. But the DL-103 has an undeniably bold and immediate sound that many people associate with much more expensive low output MC designs.

I just got in touch with Denon to see if they would loan me a DL-103 or 103R for a detailed review in Positive Feedback Online. I'm also planning to conatct Kevin at KAB about whether or not the fluid damper will work with my SL-1400Mk2, which is the only Technics I have on hand right now. If both work out, I'll be able to do a thorough listening test of the DL-103 and a nice sidebar on how it performs with -- and without -- the fluid damper.