It is like medicine an art based on science.....
Because of the human factor….Remember that even if the ears are less accurate than a singular dial corresponding to a particular set of a measure instrument, the ears can coordinate multi measuring coming from different kind of apparatus about all dimensions of perceived sound experience (tonal accuracy, imaging etc)......The ears are the only judge and guide through audio....
There is 2 way to act on the acoustical field of a room:
1-The PASSIVE way with some different materials absorbing or reflecting one at different locations... Most people use only this way...I use homemade materials or low cost one at strategic locations...
2- There is the ACTIVE way that is more complex but very rewarding...
a- I use a grid of active metal resonator (30)
b- I use 20 Helmholtz bottles of different sizes
c- I use a grid of connected stones and crystals
d- I use a grid of cheap 8 Schumann Generators modified with crystals and stones...
e- I use a grid of 70 little bells or cones of 2 different sizes(7mm or 9 mm) with some nano Herkimer diamonds in them ...This grid of cones stabilize for the brain the recognizing process of complementing sounds waves coming with the competing obstructing distorsions created by the topology of the room accidents...This is not science only my way to convey my understanding...
The embeddings on an audio system in his mechanical resonant field is 20 % of the S.Q.
The embeddings of an audio system in the electrical field of the house is 25 % of the S.Q.
The embeddings of an audio system in the acoustical field of the room is 55 % of the S.Q.
The % varied relatively to the methods used, but these indications gives an idea of the general results after my experiments ….
The final results are a very high S. Q. for a ridiculous cost....All my materials are homemade created or bought for peanuts....But the result is in no way cheap.... :)
You can compensate for a modest audio system relatively to a very costly one with the controlling methods linked to these 3 embeddings ,especially the acoustical one....
A vintage low cost amplifier but good product of the past for example, in a controlled room, may sound way better than a way more costly one in a non treated room..... This is the only thing I know for a fact about audio....
Upgrading is most of the times only a game , but if you dont have money, it is not necessary to spend any great amount to buy Hi-FI…. The contrary opinion is "mostly" a marketing myth.... :)
In 2 words:
The acoustician is more important than the electronical engineer.... :)
Because of the human factor….Remember that even if the ears are less accurate than a singular dial corresponding to a particular set of a measure instrument, the ears can coordinate multi measuring coming from different kind of apparatus about all dimensions of perceived sound experience (tonal accuracy, imaging etc)......The ears are the only judge and guide through audio....
There is 2 way to act on the acoustical field of a room:
1-The PASSIVE way with some different materials absorbing or reflecting one at different locations... Most people use only this way...I use homemade materials or low cost one at strategic locations...
2- There is the ACTIVE way that is more complex but very rewarding...
a- I use a grid of active metal resonator (30)
b- I use 20 Helmholtz bottles of different sizes
c- I use a grid of connected stones and crystals
d- I use a grid of cheap 8 Schumann Generators modified with crystals and stones...
e- I use a grid of 70 little bells or cones of 2 different sizes(7mm or 9 mm) with some nano Herkimer diamonds in them ...This grid of cones stabilize for the brain the recognizing process of complementing sounds waves coming with the competing obstructing distorsions created by the topology of the room accidents...This is not science only my way to convey my understanding...
The embeddings on an audio system in his mechanical resonant field is 20 % of the S.Q.
The embeddings of an audio system in the electrical field of the house is 25 % of the S.Q.
The embeddings of an audio system in the acoustical field of the room is 55 % of the S.Q.
The % varied relatively to the methods used, but these indications gives an idea of the general results after my experiments ….
The final results are a very high S. Q. for a ridiculous cost....All my materials are homemade created or bought for peanuts....But the result is in no way cheap.... :)
You can compensate for a modest audio system relatively to a very costly one with the controlling methods linked to these 3 embeddings ,especially the acoustical one....
A vintage low cost amplifier but good product of the past for example, in a controlled room, may sound way better than a way more costly one in a non treated room..... This is the only thing I know for a fact about audio....
Upgrading is most of the times only a game , but if you dont have money, it is not necessary to spend any great amount to buy Hi-FI…. The contrary opinion is "mostly" a marketing myth.... :)
In 2 words:
The acoustician is more important than the electronical engineer.... :)