It seems like a very poor business strategy. Most, I would say 99.9% of the people would want to replace a fuse in their gear with a matching rating. This is what any MFG is going to recommend as they should.
It simply doesn't make sense to me. I can be very cynical but I don't think the entire industry is a scam where they are simply taking cheap fuses and painting them or whatever. I believe there is engineering, R&D, etc. involved, but I don't understand why their fuses cannot handle current the way a 'stock' fuse can. This should be priority #1 in designing a fuse.
I DO NOT believe that all 'stock' fuses have incorrect specs and are allowing different values of current than they are claiming. I believe the mistake lies with these high end fuses. So if that is the case, why don't they correct this where people don't have to send back blown fuses and then try plan B with a higher value fuse. This has left me without confidence in their product.
It simply doesn't make sense to me. I can be very cynical but I don't think the entire industry is a scam where they are simply taking cheap fuses and painting them or whatever. I believe there is engineering, R&D, etc. involved, but I don't understand why their fuses cannot handle current the way a 'stock' fuse can. This should be priority #1 in designing a fuse.
I DO NOT believe that all 'stock' fuses have incorrect specs and are allowing different values of current than they are claiming. I believe the mistake lies with these high end fuses. So if that is the case, why don't they correct this where people don't have to send back blown fuses and then try plan B with a higher value fuse. This has left me without confidence in their product.