Is Imaging Worth Chasing?


Man, am I going to be torn apart for this. But I says what I says and I mean what I says.

Here’s a long term trend I’ve noticed in the audio press. Specs that used to be front and center in equipment reviews have essentially disappeared. Total harmonic distortion, for instance. Twenty years ago, THD was the start and end of the evaluation of any amplifier. Well, maybe power, first. Then THD. Armed with those two numbers, shopping was safe and easy.

The explanation for the disappearance is not hard to figure. Designers got so good in those categories that the numbers became meaningless. Today, most every amp on the shelf has disappearingly low distortion. Comparing .00001 to .000001 is a fool’s errand and both the writers and the readers know it. Power got cheap, even before Class D came along to make it even cheaper. Anyone who tries bragging about his 100 watts will be laughed out of the audio club.

Stereophile still needed to fill it’s pages and audiophiles still needed things to argue about so, into the void, stepped imaging. Reviewers go on and on about imaging. And within the umbrella of imaging, they write separately about the images height, width, and depth. “I closed my eyes and I could see a rock solid picture of the violas behind the violins.” “The soundstage extended far beyond the width of the speakers.” And on and on.

Now, most everyone who will read this knows more about audio equipment than me. But I know music. I know how to listen. And the number of times that I’ve seen imaging, that I’ve seen an imaginary soundstage before me, can be counted on my fingers. Maybe the fingers of one hand.

My speakers are 5-6 feet apart. I don’t have a listening chair qua listening chair but I’m usually 8-9 feet back. (This configuration is driven by many variables but sound quality is probably third on the list.) Not a terrible set-up, is my guess from reading lots of speaker placement articles. And God knows that, within the limited space available to me, I have spent enough time on getting those speakers just right. Plus, my LS50s are supposed to be imaging demons.

I’ve talked to people about this, including some people who work at high-end audio stores. Most of them commiserate. It’s a problem, they said. “It usually only happens with acoustic music,” most of them said. Strike one. My diet of indie rock and contemporary jazz doesn’t have much of that. “You’ve got to have your chair set up just right. And you’ve got to hold your head in just the right place.” Strike two. Who wants to do that?

(Most of the people reading this forum, probably. But I can’t think of any time or purpose for which I’ve held my head in a vise-like grip like that.)

It happens, every now and then. For some reason, I was once right up next to my speakers. Lots of direct sound, less reflections. “The Name Of This Band Is Talking Heads” was playing. And I literally gave a start because David Byrne was standing on the coffee table. Cool.

But, generally speaking, imaging is something I only read about. And if that little bit of imaging is the dividend of dropping more money into my system, I’m not sure that I want to deposit into that account.

I think that I still have a few steps to take that will pay benefits other than imaging. But maybe the high-end is not for me.

paul6002

I've gotten to the point in my audiophile madness where I'm satisfied with what I've got. To be sure, I've had better imaging from systems I once had than what I get now, but I've never had the level of tone quality I now enjoy. The imaging that my current system throws is more than definitely OK, too.

Yes it is worth pursuing to have it all and if you are not getting it something is wrong that probably would not be a big deal to fix.   These days it’s mostly about having just good quality gear including speakers that fit the room and are set up well for good.  imaging. 

mijostyn—"Ignorance is bliss." 

I couldn't agree more. For instance, to me, all vodka tastes the same. Once you climb out of the well, it's all the same. I have no favorites.

If I put some time and effort into it, I'm sure that I'd notice the differences. A little more effort and I'd have a favorite. But it's so much easier—and cheaper—not to care.

If only I could say the same about wine, maybe I could afford those better speakers.

 

It sounds like you have a problem hearing in 3D, as you are saying that it's been rare you have heard it. Maybe you have a condition called "image deafness". I think there are treatment facilities in Mexico....

Back when I lived in L.A., I'd grab my fiddle and go to two or three jam sessions a week at various bars and pizza joints. We'd sit in a circle, or at least a semblance of a circle. Sometimes there'd only be three or four of us. Sometimes there'd be twenty of us, some of the more reticent players sitting further back at the venue or in a corner.

Anyway, along with the sounds of beer drinking and of families eating their pizzas while chattering away, my ears were treated to  a sense of space & imaging that was both chaotic and a heck of a lot of fun. Violin, banjo, mandolin and guitar tone varied between glorious and ugly, thanks to the various skill & ineptness of me and my fellow jammers.

What I'm trying to say here is that when your audio can image well it can can do much more than give you the notes. It can generate an enveloping, intoxicating sense of real life.