Is bass the most important frequency band?


One thing I’ve noticed when upgrading my audio system is that when I have really good bass, I’m happy. If the bass is top notch, I can overlook less-than-stellar treble or so-so midrange. The opposite does not seem to be true. Sure, I can get tremendous enjoyment out of a high-fidelity playback of a flute or other instrument that doesn’t have much bass impact, but when I switch to a track that has some slam, if my sub/woofers don’t perform, I’m left wanting, and I am inclined to change the track. When my subwoofer game is top notch, there is something extremely pleasing about tight, powerful, and accurate bass response that easily puts a smile on my face and lifts my mood in a matter of seconds. Maybe it all boils down to the fact that bass frequencies are heard AND felt and the inclusion of another sense (touch/feeling) gives bass a competitive edge over midrange and treble. I am not talking about loud bass (although that can be really fun and has its place), but the type of bass that gives you a sense of a kick drum’s size or allows for the double bass to reach out and vibrate the room and your body. I propose to you that bass and sub-bass should be optimized first and foremost, followed by treble and midrange in order to maximize enjoyment. Thoughts?
128x128mkgus

Showing 1 response by mijostyn

I think many have this right. Because the room is in essence a bass instrument the variables involved make accurate bass difficult to achieve.
cd318 is also very right. "most systems don't even try." This is for good reason. IMHO no bass is better than bad bass. 

I have no problem enjoying music with no bass but you can not reproduce the "Live" experience without it. One can argue about the best way to achieve accurate bass but many residential spaces preclude making accurate bass and at best you might be able to get it at one location in the room regardless of what equipment you use and how you set it up. Using multiple subwoofers definitely helps but you still have the entire room and it's contents vibrating at various low frequencies screwing things up. Room control helps but it can not overcome poor room acoustics and items resonating and buzzing. For fun get a test record or CD and play a 40 Hz sine wave. Turn up the volume and listen to what happens. The lower you go the more items will join the symphony of buzzing and rattling. Items ringing add a higher frequency halo to it. This is usually masked by the music so you only hear the loudest problems under the right circumstances. It took several months to stop my theater screen from acting like a tambourine. Tip of the day, get a roll of butyl glazing tape from your local glass company. You can stop any rattle with it! 

Even the most intelligently designed rooms will have some problems. If you want to know what your situation is like take snapshots of the room at various locations with a measurement microphone. You can get a mic and a complete computer program for $300. It is the best tweak you could ever buy! Ideally you should get the same frequency response at the various locations. What you will get is wildly different curves. 10 dB swings are the rule and 20 dB swings are not unusual. This will happen even with a swarm system but to a lesser degree.

Unfortunately, there is no acoustic treatment that can overcome a bad room and the best solution is to limit low bass so that exaggerated low frequencies do not overcome the midrange. IMHO there is no one most important part of the audio spectrum. Midrange sibilance is every bit if not more aggravating than bad bass. I personally can't stand a system that is too bright. Old age will fix that problem. But, I have to say that hearing a system with great bass is great experience. You get that same rush you get at a live concert when the band lights up.