Silver conductors have been hitting my pleasure button, since they started using it in cables. Even so; it's been interesting, how information can still be lost, even with some, "better" cables. ie: After some reading on the Wireworld Platinum Eclipse 7 interconnects, I thought I’d try a pair, to upgrade from Silver Audio Hyacinths(a few years back) . I’d enjoyed those(feeding my main amps), for almost a decade, by then. More defined(I could listen further into the mix), but- my sound stage narrowed, by about 5-6’. Before sending the audition pair back to The Cable Company(to allow further comparison), I ordered Synergistic’s Tesla Apex interconnects(their best, below bank-breaking, then). The same beautiful rendition as the Eclipse pair, BUT- my sound stage was back, in all it’s spaciousness.
A big +1, for Michael Spallone's MPC mod(worked for me too). I did try Wireworld's Gold Eclipse 7s, between my TacT RCS 2.2X and Bass amp. They're still there.
Interconnects and Speaker Cable, What in your history hit your pleasure button?
Many of us have had several sets of interconnects and speaker cables. I have had many of the brands associated with at one time or another of being SOTA.
The ones that I remember having the most aural and mental impact on my pleasure index were the Wireworld Gold Eclipse. I am not endorsing the Copper vs. Silver debate or forgetting the Nordost, Kimber and many other brands I have owned, I just remember the Gold Eclipse as being a major listening pleasure.
And you?
The ones that I remember having the most aural and mental impact on my pleasure index were the Wireworld Gold Eclipse. I am not endorsing the Copper vs. Silver debate or forgetting the Nordost, Kimber and many other brands I have owned, I just remember the Gold Eclipse as being a major listening pleasure.
And you?
Showing 2 responses by rodman99999
@teo_audio- A little nit-picking, just for fun(apologies, to the OP): There are actually two magnitudes(layers) of difference between LCR(Classical/Newtonian/fixed) and QED. Relativity(not fixed) and it’s theories, supercedes Newtonian. Quantum, with it’s tested/proven facts regarding our reality, challenges both. QED is an attempt to unify(reconcile) Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. https://www.infoplease.com/math-science/space/universe/theories-of-the-universe-quantum-mechanics-vs-general-relativity Thus far, we’re only familiar with about 5% of our universe. When/if an understanding of the other 95% becomes available(ie: what it is/what it does/how to measure it), we may have more answers("gain a critical point of knowing"), as to why so many phenomena go unexplained(ie: what we hear regarding wire, semiconductors, dielectrics, geometries, fuses, etc). GOT LIQUID(metal, not milk)? I’d certainly be interested! Happy listening! |