If bi-amping is so great, why do some high end speakers not support it?I think the real issue here is why do some speaker designers provide the option to biwire/biamp. On the other hand, some speakers are designed so that one signal is required to drive the speaker for the intended voicing.
If bi-amping is so great, why do some high end speakers not support it?
I’m sure a number of you have much more technical knowledge
than I. so I’m wondering: a lot of people stress the value of bi-amping. My
speakers (B&W CM9, and Monitor Audio PL100II) both offer the option. I use
it on the Monitors, and I think it helps.
But I’ve noticed many speakers upward of $5k, and some more than $50k (e.g., some of Magico) aren’t set up for it.
Am I missing something? Or is this just one of the issues on which there are very different opinions with no way to settle the disagreement?
Thanks folks…
Showing 2 responses by lowrider57
I agree with the above comments. Vandersteen is the exception in that they are designed to be biwired. http://vandersteen.com/support/faqs (Scroll down the page) |