If Audiophiles care about sound, then why so few threads on acoustics


... and so many on cables?

I am sure there are 10 if not 50 times more posts on cables too?

I would hope that as audiophiles we could agree that acoustics are far more important than cables. A cable may (or should) make a fraction of a db change. Acoustics can make several db changes (or more).  A cable may have some impact on clarity or soundstage (and many can rightfully debate that). Acoustics absolutely will have an impact on soundstage.

So what is the reason? 
  • Is it because acoustics are "hard", i.e. you really have to put some thought into it? 
  • Are acoustics not sexy enough? 
  • Is it because they are often unattractive?
  • Is it because they carry much in the way of bragging rights (at least with many audiophiles)?
  • Do they not provide enough "retail therapy"?
  • Most audiophile really don't understand much about acoustics and can't contribute?
  • The difference between those who understand acoustics and those that don't is substantial for people are fearful of wading into discussions?

Interested in people's thoughts. People will drop thousands on a cable, $10K on an amp, or turntable, but I don't see anywhere near that spend on acoustics in most cases.
heaudio123

Showing 1 response by brownsfan

This is an excellent question.  I've suggested on a number of occasions that people who are dealing with room issues (or dissatisfaction with pretty good systems) invest the time and effort required to measure and interpret room acoustics using REW and use those measurements as guidance in treating their rooms.  I'm skeptical that I've actually convinced a single person to do so other than my son, who heard the difference with his own ears.  

I was late to the room treatment party myself.  In my case, I had no clue how much difference speaker and listening position alone could make, much less addition of bass traps and absorption panels.  So the first obstacle for me was ignorance of what was possible.

The second obstacle was the time it took to learn what to do and how to do it.   My retirement home has a dedicated listening room, but the room had a bunch of problems from suboptimal dimension ratios to flooring that was resonating badly.   Had I not been retired, there is simply no way that I could have afforded the time investment to sort all this out.   Even so, I've done my work in 4 phases over 5 years and I am still not done, although I am getting close.  Initial work afforded modest returns because I didn't know enough to get the biggest bang for the buck.   I'm guessing some people may buy a trap or two and don't do enough to make an appreciable difference so they give up.

Many audiophiles have more money than time, so time is subject to triage.  Spending money on the next cable or tonearm is less painful than investing 100 hours of free time in getting the room right.