I saved alot of money.


Many of you will probably disagree but I have to share. I recently started streaming from my cell phone to my system with Amazon HD and You Tube Music. 
Components are a new Hegel H390, Bryston A2 speakers, NAD C 546BEE CD player, and wait for it, a cheap Auris bluetooth thing.
Sounds great but I thought about getting an expensive streamer and/or a separate DAC.
After weeks of research I thought of doing a test. The CD player is hooked up via coaxial to the Hegel. The Auris is connected via optical. So both are using the Hegel's DAC.
I put a favorite CD into the NAD and hit pause, then pulled up the same on Amazon. Without moving from my listening position I switched between the two.
Very little difference if any between them.
I tried this with different CDs 3 different times over a week and had the same results.
My system may be cheap compared to what many of you have but my love for music is as strong or better than anyone out there.
At 66, retired, and on limited funds I'm sure glad I did this test. The results must be due to the Hegel's DAC.
Thoughts?


golden210

Showing 2 responses by cd318

@bluemoodriver,

"..but there's a kicker: after we all confirmed that we could hear meaningful differences, Wilson whipped a fake component shell off the digital source and revealed that with the Wilson speakers we weren't listening to the $20,000 CD player that had been used for the competitor's speakers, but an Apple iPod playing uncompressed WAV files!”

"Airplay is red book standard now, and blind testing tells us differences in rates above that are inaudible."



Even through premium priced products.

That was a little naughty of Dave, but he proved his point though, didn't he?

Perhaps we would all do well to remember these valuable little lessons?

Otherwise we can risk ending up like the art critic that was extolling the qualities of a particular work of art. 

Only to later discover that it was created by a chimp. Beauty might well be in the eye of the beholder, but apparently not if they are wearing a blindfold.
@golden210,

I’d agree with @bjesien, price and performance are not necessarily linked. Certainly not at the so-called high-end.

Neither would I like to say that the extremely versatile NAD C546 BEE can in any way be considered as a weak link.

Especially not when only used as a transport.

I’ve got the well regarded Marantz CD6000ki and as far as I can tell, it sounds identical to my portable Sony MP3 player. So I’m not surprised that your comparison delivered similar conclusion to mine.

So I’d say you already have a very well balanced system.

That’s an upside.

The downside is that improvements (outside the usual suspects - masterings, room, speakers etc) are difficult to suggest.

It’s always up to the individual to decide whether they can settle with their current system or feel it’s worthwhile striving for more.

Anyone can easily suggest improvements for an unbalanced system but the going gets seriously difficult with one that’s as well balanced as yours is.