i-link allows you to feed SACD and DVD-A out of the player in digital, bypassing the DAC's in the player -- so you can use better quality DAC's in your pre-amp or receiver. Without i-link, you have to use the DAC in the player and take the SACD or DVD-A signal out in analogue using one interconnect per channel. Without i-link, you can take every other format *except* SACD and DVD-A out of the player in digital using coax or toslink, bypassing the player's DAC, but to achieve the same thing with high rez, you need i-link, firewire, HDMI, or some other proprietary method. So, if the Pioneer 59AVi sounds better using i-link, I would assume that's because it allows you to use the audio DAC's in the 59 TXi receiver for SACD and DVD-A. Not sure why other formats would sound any better -- if you are currently using coax for those formats, you are already using the DAC's in the receiver for them -- unless the theory is that the i-link is a better interconnect and passes the signal better than coax, which may or may not be be true.
i.LINK connection really makes HT sound better ???
Does the i.LINK connection really makes Home theatre sound better ??
For exampleis if you use a Pioneer VSA-AX10Ai-S with a DVD player i.link connected, and not i.link connected does it really makes a HUGE difference in sound ??
1) Musical only ??
2) Movies also ??
If better, how is it better ?
For exampleis if you use a Pioneer VSA-AX10Ai-S with a DVD player i.link connected, and not i.link connected does it really makes a HUGE difference in sound ??
1) Musical only ??
2) Movies also ??
If better, how is it better ?