I can not live without "Room Correction"


Accuphase DG-28

I had been using Accuphase Digital Equalizer since 2001.

It is still working fine.

With room correction, the overall balance is much better with tighter base and flat high frequency.


I can not live without it.

http://media.slrclub.com/1809/10/s07CCj42dv666msrqgf.jpg



Recently Lyngdorf got very popular with good room correction capability.

But I am a tube guy enjoying good timber out of it.

I will not go for Lyngdorf as amplifier.



But I recommend other people to try room correction.

If you are curious, you can try used DG-28 from Japan at 1,700

Accuphase DG-28 Digital Voicing Equalizer Free Shipping (R966 | eBay


It use 100V not 120V so you may need transformer
shkong78

Showing 1 response by thastum

Hi I too tried digital room correction but found that the " price " by gaining a better tonal balance was too high. The perspective was partwise comprimised and regarding analog playback, i Got a digital print in the soundstage.
my soulution was passive roomcorrection, a part from optimal speaker and lisining position, i build passive loudspeaker absorbends to minimize the stranding waves isue. Adding 2 pairs of Shakti hallograps, one set behind the speakers and one set in the sides where the first reflection occured also made a significant improvement. It was also a good improvement to remove the system from between the speakers to the sidewall as well as hanging it on the brickwall and place a lot of decoupling under it.
its my beleafe that putting in another DAC in the system easily males a lot of mess. The passive way isent much cheaper but certaintly a heavy task to build and it tales a lot of time too.
happy lisining