How two 6550 tubes compare

Camerio,

You can use KT-88s in the ST-150 no problem. Bias to the same range as with the 6550s. I ran the Gold Lion KT-88s in mine for a year and really liked the sound. I did have some tube failures with the GLs, I only had one Tung Sol fail and the SED "Winged C" I never had a fail but they would blow the fuses now and then. Ultimately I went back to the Tung Sols due to the expense of GL and my experience with their reliablity. They were simply too expensive for me to take a chance of trying them again.

I sold the amp before I had a chance to try some of the Shuguang KT-88s but I have read that they sound very good as well.

Cheers,

Jim

Here is Camerio33's post with the proper spaces. I have no idea how your font or your message got the way it did but hopefully with the proper spacing membership here can help you out.

I just purchased an amplifier VTL ST-150 (latest version) in the used market. I have to retube the amp and I wonder if I should install tubes 6550C, as advised by the owner's manual of the company VTL, or if perhaps I should install KT88 tubes. Reading this thread, I learned that you also had an ST-150 and you have decided to "install KT88 tubes. I know what values of biasing did you do the tuning. Is what is the same as that advised the company VTL in the owner's manual for the 6550C tubes?

Thank you in advance for taking the time to answer me.

I j u s t p u r c h a s e d a n a m p l i f i e r V T L S T - 1 5 0 ( l a t e s t v e r s i o n ) i n t h e u s e d m a r k e t . I h a v e t o r e t u b e t h e a m p a n d I w o n d e r i f I s h o u l d i n s t a l l t u b e s 6 5 5 0 C , a s a d v i s e d b y t h e o w n e r ' s m a n u a l o f t h e c o m p a n y V T L , o r i f p e r h a p s I s h o u l d i n s t a l l K T 8 8 t u b e s . R e a d i n g t h i s t h r e a d , I l e a r n e d t h a t y o u a l s o h a d a n S T - 1 5 0 a n d y o u h a v e d e c i d e d t o " i n s t a l l K T 8 8 t u b e s . I k n o w w h a t v a l u e s o f b i a s i n g d i d y o u d o t h e t u n i n g . I s w h a t i s t h e s a m e a s t h a t a d v i s e d t h e c o m p a n y V T L i n t h e o w n e r ' s m a n u a l f o r t h e 6 5 5 0 C t u b e s ?

T h a n k y o u i n a d v a n c e f o r t a k i n g t h e t i m e t o a n s w e r m e .

R e g a r d s ,

C a m e r i o

In my system the SED winged C 6650 was much smoother, perhaps almost too smooth and subdued sounding compared to the SED KT88 which was much more open and dynamic. Havent heard the TS. However, if you have been using a 6650 and are ready to really open things up in comparison, switch to the SED KT88.

I have used both the Winged C and TS in my VTL ST-150. In my system I found that the TS had a more robust bass response and the Winged C has a more extended top end. The midrange in both was about equal. It seemed that I got more hours out of the TS before a tube failed. With the Winged C my B+ fuses would blow every now and then. That being said I could live with either happily.

Cheers,
Jim

For quite a few years, I had no problems affording NOS power tubes, from the 50's and 60's. I had been using eight Phillips ECG 6550s in my current Cary amps. About 4 years ago, when they got weak, I was looking for either more Phillips or some GE 6550A's. A matched NOS octet?: Forget about it!! I was greatly pleased to find that the St Petersburg plant Winged 'C' 6550s provided an equivalence in sound staging and the mids ands highs, but ever better(faster, more solid) mid-bass performance. I got the matched octet from Kevin Deal(Upscale Audio). If you were to contact him: He would be able to advise you of any sonic differences between the TS and Winged 'C' iterations of the 6550: (http://www.upscaleaudio.com/view_category.asp?cat=85)