How do MIT and Transparent cables differ?

Audiofeil is correct. Transparent uses a very simple in line filter approach, while MIT uses a more complex patented "out of the signal path" group of technologies. I heard some $100/pair cables that sound as good or better than some $6k plus cables...system matching and personal listening preferences dictate alot!

Brisson took his toys and went out on his own. Transparent had invested in cable manufacturing so they had to come up with a cable design to market. They chose a simpler, in line low pass tuneable filter approach which rejects UHF interference and lowers the noise floor substantialy. MIT or Transparent will of course give results that are influenced by the system their in:O) I have a pair of Monster M2.2s spkr cables and SP1000M5 proline IC's patched in right now in place of my favorite Transparent and MIT stuff...pretty damn sweet! Cost for the Monsters is around $500 vs $20K for my other rig.