I went through the same situation with even higher priced gear and unfortunately with the same dissappointing results for two channel music. I did the same also hooking up and old marantz receiver that showed everything the Home Theater gear was lacking for music. I have a TV and the 5000 dollar onkyo home theater receiver and a dvd player seperate now and my kids use it and I spent far less on a good two channel system and if I want to watch a movie or TV myself I do it through this and am quite happy with it. Larryi makes some very valid points. The arcam is a decent amp but is a little bright and the energy speakers are a little bright as well( for my tastes ) , so you could be rite that the two don,t fit well together but in the end unless you spend ridiculous amounts of money it will be hard to have a system to do both well. At least with results that will keep you happy enough to not always be looking to better or change. Thats the reason I for the most part gave up on Home Theater and the beleif I could be satisfied for both music and movies with the same system. A friend of mine added a nice tubed pre-amp using the processor loop to integrate it with home theater and it certainly did give hime great two channel music but the cost was quite high conscidering the equipment he already had. Cheers
High End system sounding Terrible????
Hi. I invested quit a bit of dough in my system and I'm disatisfied to say the least. I have an Arcam AVR-300, Arcam CD-73, and a NAD DVD player with Energy C-3's for my mains and Energy C-C1 Centre. Movies sound fine but when playing music the sound is overly bright (harsh), and bass lacking. The sound is also kind of lifeless, not very involving. I had an old 30 watt/CH Rotel from the 80's that I enjoyed much more for music through the C-3s. Could it be bad speaker matching.I bought the amp new from Creative Audio and even if it's not broke in shouldn't sound this bad.Can someone please help...
- ...
- 15 posts total
- 15 posts total