HiFi News Test Record Azimuth


I recently got the HiFi News Test Record and wanted to know what was your experience with setting up the Azimuth.
I got very low output when I flicked the mono switch but how do I know whether it’s set right?
kunalraiker

Showing 2 responses by boothroyd

I’ll go with MC’s #1

Analog is not perfect. Importance is based on sound quality.

While listening, sibilance will turn into detail with longer trails when azimuth is correct.

While somewhat closely related to Anti-Skating, more than other setup parameters, the objective in simple terms is to get the U shaped stylus properly oriented in the V shaped groove for optimal contact of the groove walls.

Use of Acoustic Sounds Ultimate Analogue Test LP and Fozgometer can often be optimal is my go to for starters. Realize though that we are introducing an electrical variable to a mechanical measurement and coil separation differences between channels can sometimes mess things up.
All fear aside, the wonderful thing about analog is that if it sounds good, it is good.

 I whole heartedly agree on eliminating unnecessary setup tools. A trusty metal Dennison & a few other pieces, bits and records can get me as far down the road as any system will allow. I must say though, access to a real microscope can be a big plus if things don’t come together from a way off microscopic stylus alignment.
After 200x viewing of enough cartridge styli under the big lens, I fail to see the importance of many procedures which promote intense alignment to objects that simply don’t matter.

Like driving, we must be aware of the contact patch.

A straight forward setup is the best place to begin the combing-through process. The more serious the stylus profile - the more work you’ll have to comb through.