2. speakers
  3. 159915-139027

Help me understand "the swarm" in the broader audiophile world

I'm still fairly new out here and am curious about this Swarm thing. I've never owned a subwoofer but I find reading about them--placement, room treatments, nodes, the crawl, etc--fascinating. I'm interested in the concept of the Swarm and the DEBRA systems, and I have a very specific question. The few times I've been in high-end, audiophile stores and asked about the concept of the Swarm, I've tended to get some eye-rolling. They're selling single or paired subwoofers that individually often cost more and sometimes much more than a quartet of inexpensive, modest subs. The same thing can be said for many speaker companies that make both speakers and subs; it's not like I see Vandersteen embracing the use of four Sub 3's. 

My question is this: do in fact high-end stores embrace the concept of multiple, inexpensive subs? If not, cynicism aside, why not? Or why doesn't Vandersteen or JL or REL and so on design their own swarm? For those out here who love multiple subs, is it a niche thing? Is it a certain kind of sound that is appealing to certain ears? The true believers proselytize with such zeal that I find it intriguing and even convincing, and yet it's obviously a minority of listeners who do it, even those who have dedicated listening rooms. (I'm talking about the concept of four+ subs, mixed and matched, etc. I know plenty of folks who embrace two subs. And I may be wrong about all my assumptions here--really.)

Now, one favor, respectfully: I understand the concept and don't need to be convinced of why it's great. That's all over literally every post on this forum that mentions the word "sub." I'm really interested in why, as far as I can tell, stores and speaker companies (and maybe most audiophile review sites?) mostly don't go for it--and why, for that matter, many audiophiles don't either (putting aside the obvious reason of room limits). Other than room limitations, why would anyone buy a single JL or REL or Vandy sub when you could spend less and get ... the swarm? 


northman

Showing 1 response by teo_audio

teo_audio
2,197 posts
 
@Erik_squires wrote:

" The idea that only swarms can sound good, or are the ideal fix for any possible ailment your system has is just not supported by evidence."

This is what’s called a "straw man argument", and is a fallacy. Here’s the definition for anyone not familiar with the term:

"A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person’s argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."

Duke


Actually Eric is correct in the idea that it does not fix the room. This swarm idea. It overwhelms the problems and buries it under noise, in an area where the human ear is least sensitive. Like Styx said, "you’re fooling yourself if you don’t believe it..."


First, Fix the room.

Fix the room
Fix the room
Fix the room
Fix the room.

Can’t say it enough times.

Fix the room.

Acoustics. But not enough people know how or can supply the material to do so.

I’ve been standing by the side of someone who can fix the room and is many times called in to be the given acoustical and noise control ’cooler’ to the given acoustical company’s ’bouncer’. Where the bouncers, any and all of them (sometimes 4 companies in a row), can’t get the job done. None will guarantee their work. Taras guarantees his work, contractually. Unique, for the most part, in the entire acoustics business.

But he can and invariably does get it done.There is a reason that almost every single time Teo Audio is involved in a hotel room at a show.... it captures ’best of show’.

The stories I could tell you. But he won’t allow me to tell them.
More to discover